
When you die, the silent Moon,
In her interstellar swoon,
Is not sadder in her cell
Than deserted Ariel.
When you live again on earth,
Like an unseen star of birth,
Ariel guides you o'er the sea
Of life in your nativity.
And so I wrote these lines, pondering, wondering ...
Jane,
Do you wish to be reborn,
to feel the pleasant blush of morn
light on your skin, or does the thorn
still sting, that barbed the fairest rose?
See how the rose, remembered, glows!
Speak to me Jane, now, and disclose:
Dear, do you wish to live again,
to dream in poetry, the pen
sharp in your grasp, and speak to men?
It was now sometime after midnight, meaning the date had changed to December 3,
2007. Reading Shelley again, I came upon these lines ...
And now, alas!, the poor sprite is
Imprisoned, for some fault of his,
In a body like the grave;—
From you he only dares to crave
For his service and his sorrow,
A smile today, a song tomorrow.
... which, after having read, I wrote ...
A smile today, a song tomorrow,
small debt to pay—for a little sorrow,
a pleasant service, and your presence.
But think how strange this world of men is!
O, could you wish to live again?
To write, with magic in your pen,
or music, thunder, worlds of wonder?
Come, write, perhaps the world we'll plunder!
But think awhile—to make me smile,
now that would be a Veritable Wonder!
If it was possible for a poet whose life ended tragically early to write
again, what method might she choose? Might she choose to be reborn, only to
suffer and die again? Might she choose to write posthumously, as it were, by
being channeled through another poet's pen? Or might she choose to remain
silent, either biding her time for awhile, or forever? These are seemingly
unanswerable questions. There are artists who claim to have channeled other
artists. And I remember watching a documentary recently about a man called "John
of God" who claims to channel Dom Inácio and other
healing entities, with what seems like remarkable success. And of course Edgar
Cayce was renowned for being able to heal people by going into a trance and
receiving information "from beyond." Can a poet speak from Beyond?
If nothing else happens from all this, at least I will have come to know a
family member better, and to keep her memory and words alive. And it will still
be interesting to write poems for her, if not exactly "with" her. But who knows
...
I'd like to close the first "installment" of this story with more lines from
Shelley ...
All this it knows, but will not tell
to those who cannot question well
the Spirit that inhabits it ...
... It keeps its highest, holiest tone
for our belovèd
Jane alone.
And 'tis her we welcome home.
Michael R. Burch
December 2-3, 2007

In the picture above, the handsome gentleman fourth from
the right is my Grandfather, Paul Ray Burch Sr. (I get my middle name from him
and my father, Paul Ray Burch, Jr.). Grandad worked for C. B. Ragland, in
Nashville, Tennessee, as a truck driver. He is reputed to have once lifted the
back end of his truck one day, so that a tire could be changed t of Jane's that had a red
star attached. The first three words created something of a reverie for me,
while the last four bade me remember my first summer job, which I remember not
all that well, nor in any way fondly ...
Red Star
by Sandra Jane Burch and Michael Ray Burch
Awhile
almost
tonight,
as to the
labor
of words I bend,
I nearly remember the first summer
I worked
(was it hard?),
and did I earn a Red Star?
From reading through Jane's folder, I believe I see several "family
resemblances." First, she seems to have been an "A" student, which I was in my
day. School was usually easy for me: sometimes too easy. Second, she seems to
have had a rebellious streak, which is perhaps my major failing, if
rebelliousness is a failing. (I like to think it isn't.) Jane seems to have been
made to write the same words over and over again on more than one occasion,
presumably as punishment. I got in rather more trouble than that, but then I had
more time to evolve. Third, her handwriting reminds me of my own. And fourth,
and most importantly, she was a poet. I'm quite glad to be related to her! But
her heavy-handed teacher has gotten me more than a little perturbed:
Another Red Star,
my Scholar,
but here and there
the Collar
of a heavy-handed
Teacher—
Great Heaps of Repeated Words,
Redundancies Absurd!
Never mind,
Spectacular Creature—
you'll be the Bright Star
of my Feature!
It's a bit strange to think of Jane as my aunt, because in the pictures I have
of her, and in her single poem, and in her schoolwork, she is a very young girl,
a fourth-grader. Trying to imagine her looking at me now, as my aunt, with me
being so many years her elder, led me to write the following lines:
Jane,
I imagine your eyes
upon me,
and I imagine
having an American aunt
to hug, hold and dote upon me,
as my English "aunties" did,
and I imagine there is nothing hidden
between us,
because we are both poets,
and clever,
rebellious students,
and curious, skeptical scholars,
like Shelley
(have you met him,
in some heavenly realm;
does he sing there like an Angel,
some glorious unlikely hymn
to the consternation of the Christians?).
And I imagine you
smiling indulgently
at my conniptions.
I've just spotted another "family resemblance"—this one between Jane and my son,
Jeremy, who has been known to "fudge" on multiplication problems by adding
recursively instead ...
Family Affair
I see you cheated
at multiplication
(or was it "improvised"?).
Your "twelve times four"
answer
was obfuscated,
then you wrote
four "twelves"
with a "plus" beside
and added them up
(just as Jeremy, your nephew, my son,
has likewise done!).
Of course after so many years there are mysteries. In Jane's folder there are a
number of small blank squares of paper. What did she cut them out for, and why
did they remain blank? ...
Your little caper
with beige construction paper
escapes me,
and the small white squares
and the aquamarine,
what do they mean?
I suspect they were
houses,
or boxes (for gnomes?).
Or perhaps
prosaic squares
for elegantly cursive poems?
Another clue that Jane was a poet ...
On February 9th, 1955,
ten days and three years
short of the date of my birth,
you wrote:
"10. beautiful—Pleasing to the senses, especially to the ear."
Why, I wonder, "especially to the ear"?
Was it because you're a poet? That's the spirit!
(But was there a scale of one to ten
back then,
long before Dudley Moore and Bo Derek?)
Michael R. Burch
December 3-4, 2007