The Bible’s Satanic Verses: Slavery, Sex Slavery, Infanticide,
Matricide, Homophobia, Ethnic Cleansing and Genocide
How can we explain the Bible's satanic verses? Where did the Bible's evil
verses originate―the ones that command or condone slavery, sex slavery,
infanticide, matricide, genocide, ethnic cleansing, the stoning of children to death
for misdemeanors and of girls for not bleeding on their wedding nights?
Christianity is based on the credibility and authority of the Bible, and yet the Bible is far worse than Hitler’s Mein Kampf in
numerous passages. These are just three terrible examples, out of
many that I could cite:
• Moses, the first and greatest prophet of the Hebrew Bible, and the lawgiver who claimed to have received his instructions directly from God,
commanded his warriors to slaughter captured mothers and their male "little
ones" (i.e., babies and toddlers) while keeping only the virgin girls alive, obviously as sex slaves. [Numbers 31:9-18]
• Moses said that fathers could sell their own daughters as sex slaves, with the option to buy them back if they
"please" their new masters. [Exodus 21:7-8]
• Moses commanded that girls who had been raped should either be stoned to death (a brutal method of execution) or sold to their
rapists, meaning that they would become sex slaves who could then be raped "legally" for the rest of their lives.
According to the highly dubious "wisdom" of Jehovah and Moses, only girls who
were raped in fields where no one could hear their cries for help were to be spared. [Deuteronomy 22:23-29]
I agree with Mark Twain, perhaps the most prominent American critic of the
Bible, who said that it wasn't the verses he didn't understand that bothered him
... it was the horrific and grotesque verses that he understood all too well.
by Michael R. Burch, an editor
and publisher of Holocaust poetry
and a "recovering fundamentalist"
In other words, if a girl was raped within earshot of a city or town, it was to be presumed that she had
"encouraged" her rapist, by not crying out for help. No thought was to given to
any possibility that her rapist may have held his
hand over her mouth, or a knife to her throat, or that she was simply too terrified to scream. But even if the girl had deliberately chosen
not to scream, why should she be murdered or forced to become a sex slave for having
You can read the passages above and form your own conclusions, but they seem
incredibly barbaric to me. And these passages are only the tip of the
iceberg, as the Bible contains many other grotesque commandments
attributed to prophets like Moses, and to Jesus and the apostles, and even to a
supposedly all-wise, just God.
How are such things possible?
There is a simple (albeit horrifying) explanation for the sex slave verses. Like many primitive tribes, the ancient Hebrews prized boys
over girls. Boys were seen as boons because they could farm and hunt, helping to produce food
and support their parents as they aged. But most girls were "valuable" only if they were
virgins, in which case their fathers could marry them off in return for dowries
(a form of sex slavery). But when a girl was raped, she lost her primary "value" and
because her father risked having to support her for the rest of his life, Moses'
macabre "solution" was either to kill her, or have her rapist buy her from
her father for cold cash. According to this bizarre "logic," a rich man could acquire a harem of sex slaves by raping girls, then buying them
when no other man would have them because they were no longer virgins. But how can this possibly be the "wisdom of God"
unless God is the Devil?
Christians call Islam a "false religion" because Muslim girls have
been stoned to death for being raped. But the
same barbaric thinking is enshrined in the Bible. Should the pot call the kettle black?
There are many satanic verses in the Bible. Here are 17 evil verses, taken
from a single chapter:
13-21: If a man takes a wife but begins to "hate" her, he can claim that she was
not a virgin on her wedding night. If she cannot prove her virginity by
producing blood-stained "tokens" of her virginity, the men should stone her to
death, a truly horrible method of execution. Of course not all women bleed the
first time they have sex, so this is not only evil, but sheer barbaric folly.
22: Kill people for having sex.
23-24: If a girl or woman is raped anywhere except in a field, assume that she
could have cried out for help but didn't, then stone her to death.
25-27: If a girl or woman is raped in a field, assume that no one could have
heard her, so let her live. In other words, rape victims are guilty if they can
possibly be heard, taking no thought for the fact that the rapists might have
gagged them, or knocked them unconscious, or held knives to their throats.
28-29: If a girl or woman is not betrothed to anyone and is raped, her rapist
can buy her as a sex slave by making a cash payment to her father. If he does
this, he is responsible for "taking care of her" from that point on.
No one with any human compassion or sense of justice can read this chapter without
blanching. How did such a grotesquely evil book come to be in the Bible? The
Bible itself explains, in the account of the boy-king Josiah and the Levites who
"discovered" a "lost book of Moses." The book was probably Deuteronomy. The
Levites used the "book of Moses" to go on a murderous spree, killing anyone who
disagreed with their bloody cult.
There are many other satanic passages in the Bible, such as commanding the
stoning of children for misdemeanors (multiple verses) and the sexual enslavement of virgin girls
captured in wars while their baby brothers and mothers were slaughtered (Numbers 31).
How anyone can read such evil madness and claim the Bible is "the word of God"
is beyond me. Perhaps parts of the Bible are inspired: that is a matter of
faith. But Jesus said that a good tree cannot produce bad fruit. If he spoke for
God, then God cannot produce evil commandments. The Bible's evil passages can
only be explained as the product of evil, twisted minds. Good people and
enlightened beings do not command such horrors. As the old saw goes, "The proof
is in the pudding." Chapter 22 of Deuteronomy and other similar passages of the
Bible prove that the pudding is often rancid.
The Bible repeatedly commands or condones racism, sexism, religious intolerance,
homophobia, slavery, sex slavery, matricide, infanticide, ethnic
cleansing and genocide. While Christians often try to gloss over horrendous Old Testament verses by
claiming that the New Testament is "better," in reality the New Testament is
worse, because it says that human beings will
be eternally tortured in "hell" for having sex. If you had to choose, would you prefer eternal torture to
being stoned to death? And yet no
civilized court or judge would consider either death or torture for any sort of consensual sex, and even rapists are not tortured for their crimes
in civilized nations.
So if the Bible is the "word of God," it seems God has a lot to learn about
justice, or else he has no ability to keep human beings from pretending to
speak for him.
But if the Bible is "inerrant" or "infallible," things get much worse because Jesus said that thinking about sex (i.e., "lust") is the same as
committing adultery. Since another verse in the New Testament says that all adulterers will go to the Lake of Fire (i.e., "hell"), it seems that
every human being is condemned to hell, since everyone thinks about sex once they reach puberty. What a horrible religion to teach to young,
highly impressionable children! What happens when they reach puberty and start
thinking about sex? If they believe the Bible is the "word of God," they may
feel all the weight of God and hell resting on their slender shoulders. I know I
did as a young boy.
Teaching children about "hell" is child abuse, pure and simple. We don't allow
priests and pastors to abuse children physically, so why do we allow them to
abuse children emotionally, psychologically and spiritually, with the grotesque
dogma of "hell"?
It seems completely obvious to me that these Satanic verses of the Bible could not have originated with a God who is loving, wise, compassionate
and just. Thus the claims of Christian theologians, popes, priests and pastors that the Bible is the "inerrant" and/or
"infallible" word of God are patently ludicrous. No one can "prove" that any verse in the Bible came from God, but we can
easily prove that many Bible verses could not have come from a God who is loving, wise, compassionate and just. After all, no one would call a man
loving, wise, compassionate or just if he murdered or tortured girls for being raped, or having consensual sex. But how many girls were
murdered or enslaved, thanks to the commandments of Moses? And how many children (and adults) have been terrified because they thought about
sex, and believed their thoughts condemned them to "hell"? One shudders to wonder.
And "Bible believing" Christians are obviously lying to themselves, and the world, when they claim to
"know" that homosexuality and sex before marriage are "sins," based on the evidence of the Bible. According to the
Bible, from Genesis to Revelation, slavery is "the will of God," as Jefferson Davis pointed out to Congress before the Civil War.
Four of the seceding Southern states used the Bible to "prove" the "godliness" of slavery, in their formal declarations of their
reasons for leaving the Union. We also know from Mark Twain and other anti-slavery writers that the Bible was used to justify slavery in
churches and schools throughout the antebellum South. But if not a single one of the writers of the Bible knew that slavery was an abomination,
how can we possibly credit what they said about homosexuality and extramarital sex?
So why not be honest, and admit that the writers of the Bible who called extramarital sex "evil" and sex slavery "the will of
God" were primitive barbarians with no sense of justice? Even Jesus and Paul deserve criticism, because according
to the Bible they spent a great deal of time debating matters of diet and Sabbath observance, while never saying a clear word against the practice of slavery,
even though they ministered to slaves and their masters. Hell, Paul even returned an escaped Christian slave, Onesimus, to his Christian
master, Philemon! The book of Philemon would later be used by American slavemasters to "prove" they had the right to
demand that other Christians return
escaped slaves to them. Was it "wise" for Jesus and Paul to make it seem slavery was
kosher with God, by failing to denounce it?
The Bible contains many satanic verses. Revelation is an expecially grotesque book which prophesied that Jesus Christ himself
would murder the children of a woman who was having extramarital sex: "I will kill her children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which searcheth the reins
[kidneys] and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according to your works." [Revelation 2:20-23]
Are these the words of a loving, wise, just, enlightened being? What happened to love, compassion, forgiveness, and the message of Saint Paul
that salvation is by grace? What sort of ogre kills children for their mother’s actions? Where is there any justice in killing
people (much less their children) for having sex? And what on earth do the
kidneys have to do with morality?
Revelation 14:10, one of the most horrendous verses in the Bible, or any book, says that human beings will be tortured with fire and brimstone "in the
presence of the Lamb and Holy Angels." So much for hell being "separation from God." According to John of Patmos, the
fire-breathing author of Revelation, there will be a torture chamber in heaven, at the foot of the throne of God, and the "saints"
will scream for vengeance and blood, rather than ask for love, forgiveness, compassion and mercy.
The Jesus of Revelation is an inhuman monster slated to become the greatest mass murderer in the history of the Earth, if the prophecies of
John come to pass. After all earth’s innocent creatures have sung the praises of God, according to
Revelaton, Jesus and
the Angels will proceed to torture and destroy them. But how can loving, compassionate, wise, just, enlightened beings do such terrible things
to innocent creatures?
The Hebrew Bible is full of atrocities committed in the name of God. But with the introduction of "hell" in the
New Testament, God and Jesus became infinitely more savage than even the mass-murdering, women- and child-killing "heroes" of the
Old Testament, such as Moses, Joshua, Caleb and King David.
Was David "the man after God’s own heart," really? According to the Bible, David killed every woman when he "smote the
land" and he ordered the slaughter of the lame and blind when Jerusalem was taken from the Jebusites. David never repented, because with
his dying breath he commanded the assassination of Joab, ostensibly for having shed innocent blood. But it was David who had awarded Joab the
command of his armies for slaughtering the lame and the blind!
Isn’t it time to be honest about the Bible and its Satanic verses, and stop giving such a dreadful book to young, innocent, highly
impressionable children, telling them that it’s "the word of God"? How can Christians say it’s a "sin" to
lie when they’re dishonest about the Bible and its human origins? (Assuming that God isn’t
really the Devil, and didn’t actually command the
slaughter of rape victims, mothers, babies and the handicapped.)
Is the Bible "infallible"? The idea is patently ridiculous. I read the Bible from cover to cover as a young boy and was horrified
time and time again by what it said about "men of God" like Moses, Joshua,
Caleb and David. I agree with Mark Twain: it wasn’t
the verses that I failed to understand that bothered me ... it was the verses that I understood
all too well.
A God who is good cannot command sex slavery and the murder of rape victims. A God who is
good cannot command
the stoning to death of boys for being "stubborn." And yet the Bible repeatedly commands such
terrible things. So the obvious problem for Christians is that the Bible contains what Salman Rushdie called "Satanic verses" when he wrote about highly
dubious verses in the Koran.
Orthodox Christianity seems to have no sense of justice. A good human doctor who is able to save a patient doesn’t allow the patient to die
because he's an atheist, an agnostic, a Muslim, or a homosexual. But according to orthodox Christianity, even though Jesus Christ was able to
save the thief on the cross with a nod of his head, he won’t bother to nod his head at billions of other people,
simply because they didn’t
"believe" in him. But of course Jesus never bothered to introduce
himself to them personally. And if Jesus is such a cruel, unjust, petty being, why
should anyone believe in him?
Shouldn’t believing in Jesus involve believing something good about
him? If Jesus is good, wouldn’t it be blasphemy to say that he would send people to hell for not believing in him, when he was either
unable or unwilling to speak to them personally?
If I had a son and refused to ever speak to him, what right would I have to
demand that he "believe" in me? Christians insist that I need to "believe" in
Jesus, but that insistence is wildly unjust. If Jesus wants me to believe in
him, he should use his superpowers—which presumably include the ability to
speak—to communicate with me. If he is unable or unwilling to communicate with
me, he has no right to punish me for concluding that he either doesn’t exist or
lacks the ability to communicate with me directly. And
it makes absolutely no sense for him to expect me to believe things about
him based on what the Bible says, because certain verses in the Bible turn him
into a monster. The only way I can believe anything good about Jesus is to not
believe the main tenet of orthodox Christianity: that he will only save the
"chosen few." What a ghastly thing to believe about anyone! What sort of monster
would I be if I sent Einstein and Gandhi to hell for not "believing" in me, when
I had deliberately chosen never to speak to them, or lacked the ability to speak
If you were able to save other people from a terrible fate with a nod of your
head, would you save
them, or turn your back on them in a fit of pique? Many Christians try to evade
what their "faith" has done to Jesus by asking what a human judge would do with
a rapist or murderer: "Should people who are guilty go unpunished?" But the
purpose of a prison sentence is to protect the innocent and rehabilitate the
criminal, not to cause mindless,
unremitting pain because the judge's ego wasn't gratified. And human judges are not able to "save" in the way that Jesus has
been said to be able to save people who are seemingly beyond hope, such as the
thief on the cross and murderers on their deathbeds. If Jesus is able to save by
grace, as the Bible claims,
then he is obviously not in the same predicament as human judges who sometimes have no
choice but to lock people up for extended periods of time.
If Jesus is able to save Christians at the last minute despite the fact that
they’re far from perfect, why would he fail to save everyone? If he plans to
save Christians who acted as if he was a petty egomaniac, would it make any
sense whatsoever for him to send Einstein and Gandhi to hell, when they never
blasphemed his good name? (And isn’t it ironic that non-Christians like Einstein and
Gandhi have more faith in Jesus than most Christians?)
Does Jesus continue to exist? I have no way of knowing, but what I do know is
that I prayed to Jesus as a small boy, in tears of despair, and he never answered me. When
he failed to answer me, while Bible-befuddled adults turned my life
into hell on earth, in his name, by convincing me that I was in danger of hell
every time I sneezed, he forfeited any possible right to my belief. Why didn’t
he appear and tell me not to believe that he was the petty, unjust monster everyone
painted him to be? There seem to be three possibilities: (1) Jesus was unable to speak to me,
or (2) Jesus declined to speak to me even though he could have, or (3) Jesus no
longer exists. If the first case is true, then Jesus is not the all-powerful
being Christians claim him to be. If the second case is true, then Jesus
obviously doesn’t care what I believe about him. If the third case
is true, Christianity is a false religion. But in any case, why are Christian adults
making their children’s lives hell, here on earth?
If God ever spoke to human beings, it seems he’s given up the enterprise as a
lost cause. Why didn’t God speak to me when I was a boy, and spare me the
untender ministrations of his religion-addled disciples? Why does he allow his
name to be continually blasphemed from morning to night by people who claim to
"love" him while insisting he's the most petty being imaginable? Why have Jews
and Christians killed women and children in the name of God, and taken slaves in
the name of God, and burned "witches" and "heretics" in the name of God, and
practiced bigotry and intolerance in the name of God, for thousands of years?
Why didn’t God ever bother to tell his disciples clearly that there were no
witches, and that they were the heretics and
From cover to cover, the Bible is wrong about slavery. From cover to cover,
the Bible is wrong about sex (what are the odds that two people will be happier
together if they enter marriage as virgins, rather than testing the waters first
to see whether they’re sexually compatible and can live together?). So who’s to
say that from cover to cover the Bible isn’t also wrong about homosexuality and
other subjects as well?
Unless God is the Devil, the Bible's satanic verses cannot be the word of God.
Since the Bible is far from "inerrant" or "infallible," it is past time for
Christians to stop telling highly impressionable children that the Bible is "the
word of God." And perhaps most importantly, Christian churches need to end the
abuse they inflict on children when they say, "Only Jesus can save
BUT." That's a huge, terrifying "but." Children aren't stupid, and
they'll quickly figure out that this means "only people who believe what we
believe have any chance of heaven, and everyone else is eternally out of luck."
That's a terrible form of brainwashing which denies children
the ability to think independently. I know, because I suffered the abuse
of the Christian dogma of hell, and it took me more than forty years to finally
escape it. I hope, pray and believe that one day such child abusers will have
their children taken from them, just as children are taken from adults who
physically abuse them.
Why did God and Jesus never act to defend millions (probably billions) of
innocent children who grew up under the dark cloud of "hell", as I did? That is
a matter of personal faith, and doubt. But I, for one, certainly see no reason
to believe in "gods" and "saviors" who either don't exist, or who don't care
about the suffering of children, or who are so lacking in ability that after
thousands of years they still can't communicate simple ideas to their disciples
clearly. Nowhere in the Bible can we find such simple, sensible ideas as "it is
best to see if you are sexually and otherwise compatible with a potential mate
before you marry" and "slavery is an abomination that ruins the lives of both
slave and master." And rather than spending so much time debating matters of
diet, dress, Sabbath observance, etc., why didn't God and Jesus say something
really useful that would have saved untold suffering and hundreds of millions of
lives, such as "You can prevent the Black Plague with rat control and better
hygiene" and "there are naturally occurring wonder drugs in tree bark and green
mold"? Why were God, Jesus, the apostles and Hebrew prophets incapable of such
small gems of wisdom?
It seems obvious to me that the God of the Bible, if he exists, never knew
anything more about science or nature than the men who gave us the Bible ... and
his "ethics" still leave a lot to be desired.
Here are examples of 20 satanic passages in the Bible:
1. God drowns the whole earth.
7:21-23 , God drowns the entire population of the earth: men, women,
children, fetuses, and perhaps unicorns. Only a single family survives. In Matthew
24:37-42, Jesus approves of this genocide and plans to repeat it
when he returns.
2. God kills half a million people.
Chronicles 13:15-18, God helps the men of Judah kill 500,000 of their
3. God slaughters all Egyptian firstborn.
12:29, God the baby-killer slaughters all Egyptian firstborn children and
cattle after hardening the Pharaoh's heart to make him want to keep the Hebrews
as slaves, then killing innocents in a grotesque pissing contest for alpha male
16:41-49, the Israelites complain that God is killing too many of them. In
God sends a plague that kills 14,000 more of them.
5. Genocide after genocide after genocide. In Joshua
6:20-21, God helps the Israelites destroy Jericho, killing “men and women,
young and old, cattle, sheep and donkeys.” In Deuteronomy
2:32-35, God has the Israelites kill everyone in Heshbon, including
children. In Deuteronomy
3:3-7, God has the Israelites do the same to the people of Bashan. In Numbers
31:7-18, the Israelites kill all the Midianites except for the virgins,
whom they take as spoils of war. In 1
Samuel 15:1-9, God tells the Israelites to kill all the Amalekites – men,
women, children, infants, and their cattle – for something the Amalekites’
ancestors had done 400 years earlier.
6. God kills 50,000 people for curiosity.
Samuel 6:19, God kills 50,000 men for peeking into the ark of the
covenant. (Newer cosmetic translations count only 70 deaths, but their text
notes admit that the best and earliest manuscripts put the number at 50,070.)
7. In Exodus
32, God commands Moses: “Each man strap a sword to his side. Go back and forth through the
camp from one end to the other, each killing his brother and friend and
neighbor.” About 3,000 people died.
10:10-11, God helps the Israelites slaughter the Amorites by sword, then
finishes them off with rocks from the sky.
19:24, God kills everyone in Sodom and Gomorrah with fire from the sky.
Then God kills Lot’s wife for looking back at her burning home. But Lot is
called "righteous" even though he offered his daughters to a mob of racists,
then committed incest with them himself, after getting drunk. Talk about male
Kings 2:23-24, some kids tease the prophet Elisha, and God sends bears to
dismember 42 of them. (Newer cosmetic translations say the bears “maul” the children,
but the original Hebrew,baqa, means “to tear apart.”)
21:1-23, a tribe of Israelites misses roll call, so the other Israelites
kill them all except for the virgins, which they take for themselves. Still not
happy, they hide in vineyards and pounce on dancing women from Shiloh to take
them for themselves.
16:27-30, God gives Samson strength to bring down a building to crush 3,000
members of a rival tribe in an act of suicidal terrorism.
19:22-29, a mob demands to rape a "godly" master’s guest. The master offers
his daughter and a concubine to them instead. They take the concubine and
gang-rape her all night. The master finds her on his doorstep in the morning,
cuts her into 12 pieces, and ships the pieces around the country.
14. Child sacrifice.
11:30-39, Jephthah burns his daughter alive as a sacrificial offering for
God’s favor in killing the Ammonites.
15. God helps Samson kill 30 men because he lost a bet.
14:11-19, Samson loses a bet for 30 sets of clothes. The spirit of God
comes upon him and he kills 30 men to steal their clothes and pay off the debt.
Samson has sex with prostitutes, but God favors him as long as he never cuts his
hair. But another Bible verse says that it's a shame for a man to have long
16. God is murderously intolerant.
13:6-10, God commands that you must kill your wife, children, brother, and
friend if they worship other gods.
Kings 1:9-10, Elijah gets God to burn 51 men to death with fire from heaven to prove
that he is God.
38:9-10, God kills a man for refusing to impregnate his brother’s widow.
19. God commands cannibalism.
26:27-29 and Jeremiah
19:9, God threatens to punish the Israelites by making them eat their own
20. The coming slaughter.
According to Revelation
9:7-19, God’s got more evil coming. God will make horse-like locusts with
human heads and scorpion tails, who will torture people for five months. Then
angels will kill a third of the earth’s population. Today, that would
be 2 billion people.
Trump: 666 Mark of the Beast
What did Jesus teach about Hell?
Is the Bible infallible, or the inerrant word of God?
Was hell in the Original Bible?
Is the word "hell" in the Bible?
mentioned in the Old Testament?
Hell in the New Testament
many times is "hell" mentioned in the Bible?
Hell is not Biblical!
Hell is not in the Bible!
Hell in Hebrew